Mercedes-Benz C63 SE Performance Review: Turbo 4-Cylinder & Electric Motors
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
- Name
- By Dushyant
- (@dishs)
In this review by Savagegeese, the Mercedes-Benz C63 SE performance takes center stage, causing quite a stir with its departure from the traditional V8 to a turbocharged 4-cylinder engine coupled with electric motors. This bold move has divided opinions among enthusiasts, with many questioning if the car has lost its essence. However, the team delves deep into the technical intricacies behind this controversial decision, shedding light on the advanced technology and engineering prowess that Mercedes has poured into this new setup.
The exterior design of the C63 receives high praise for its classic muscle car aesthetic, standing out from competitors like the G Series M3 and M4. Inside, the car offers a mix of premium materials and comfort features, though usability concerns arise with the touch-based MBUX infotainment system. Despite being track-capable, the C63 leans more towards providing a luxurious driving experience, with spacious and adjustable seats but compromised trunk space due to the battery pack.
Transitioning to the technical aspects, the C63 sits on the M2 platform, boasting a rear-wheel drive setup and a wider track for enhanced performance. The car's weight, nearing 5,000 lb, is partially attributed to the battery pack, which contributes to a slightly rear-biased balance. The inclusion of rear steer and variable gear ratio steering systems adds a layer of nimbleness to the driving dynamics, showcasing Mercedes' commitment to pushing the boundaries of performance and handling.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch Mercedes C63 AMG | You Like 4 Cylinders? on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for Mercedes C63 AMG | You Like 4 Cylinders?
European regulations mixed with Chinese-focused interior design
Dislike of focus on 0-60 times over other driving elements
Preference for V8 engines in C Class AMG cars
Suggestions to name the model differently due to the 4-cylinder engine
Concerns about complexity and maintenance of the drivetrain
Criticism of the excessive screens in the car
Appreciation for the in-depth discussion and analysis in the video
Disappointment in the shift from V8 to 4-cylinder engine
Speculation on the future reliability and resale value of the car
Critique of the haptic controls and technological complexity of the vehicle
Related Articles
Ultimate Off-Road Showdown: Land Rover Defender vs. Lexus GX 550
savagegeese compares Land Rover Defender 110 Extreme and Lexus GX 550 Overt Tril Plus, focusing on interior design, off-road capabilities, and driving dynamics with Bridgestone tires. Discover how these SUVs balance luxury and utility in this epic showdown.
Porsche GT4 RS vs. Monti Package: Track Performance Showdown
Savagegeese compares Porsche GT4 RS with Monti package, showcasing Monti's expertise in enhancing track performance for amateur drivers. The upgraded GT4 RS delivers sharper handling and increased stability, setting impressive lap times and solidifying its place as a top contender in the racing world.
2025 Mini Cooper S: Luxury, Customization, and Spirited Driving
The 2025 Mini Cooper S offers luxury, technology, and customization in a compact package. Despite some drawbacks, it provides a fun and engaging driving experience with zippy acceleration and nimble handling. Perfect for those seeking a unique and spirited ride.
Nissan Rogue Rock Creek Review: Off-Road Capabilities and Performance
Savagegeese reviews the Nissan Rogue Rock Creek, a new trim level in the competitive midsize CUV off-roaders class. Despite its unique appearance, lacking off-road enhancements raise questions about its capabilities. Concerns about the CVT transmission and engine performance in a crowded market of similar vehicles.