Tesla Model 3 Performance Track Test: Engineering Shortcomings Revealed
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
- Name
- By Dushyant
- (@dishs)
In this episode of Throttle House, Thomas and James put the Model 3 Performance through its paces on the track, expecting a leap in performance due to upgrades in power, aerodynamics, and chassis. However, the team quickly discovers issues with overheating brakes and tires, compromising the car's confidence mid-corner and under braking. Despite its fun drift mode and decent handling balance, the Model 3 Performance falls short in delivering the expected track performance, with lap times that do not match up to the competition.
As they push the car to its limits, the team highlights Tesla's approach of using temporary fixes like mud flaps to address underlying issues, emphasizing the need for better quality components for safety and longevity. While the Model 3 Performance offers good value for its performance, it fails to meet basic engineering standards when compared to other manufacturers. The team critiques Tesla's definition of "performance," pointing out the importance of not just adding power but ensuring overall engineering excellence for a truly competitive vehicle.
Despite the Model 3 Performance's enjoyable road performance and impressive handling balance, the team draws a line at considering it a true performance vehicle due to its shortcomings on the track. They stress the importance of engineering standards for safety and reliability, suggesting that Tesla needs to prioritize quality components over temporary solutions. While the car offers a thrilling driving experience, it ultimately falls short in delivering consistent track performance that can match up to its competitors.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch NEW Tesla Model 3 Performance Review // More Like POOformance, Amirite? on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for NEW Tesla Model 3 Performance Review // More Like POOformance, Amirite?
Older Tesla Model 3s were underbuilt for the track, lacking proper support for power and weight
Brake overheating warning on Model 3 Performance might be due to software estimating based on brake pedal pressure
Suggestions for improvements on the Model 3 include suspension and brakes
Mud flaps on Tesla models are generic accessories, with large flaps known to scrape
Mixed opinions on the Model 3 Performance redesign, with some noting issues with tires and brakes
Some viewers appreciate the fair review of the Model 3 without bias
Different car reviewers have varying takes on the same car, leading viewers to choose based on their preferences
Some viewers criticize the Model 3's performance on the track and its design
Comments on the lack of suitability of the Model 3 for track driving and the need for upgrades for better performance
Mention of Tesla's ability to update software to address issues, unlike other automakers
Related Articles
Infinity QX80 vs. Cadillac Escalade: Throttle House Review
Throttle House reviews the Infinity QX80, a redesigned SUV compared to the Cadillac Escalade. With impressive towing capacity and luxury features, the QX80 falls short in powertrain refinement. Throttle House prefers the Escalade for its superior driving experience.
Ultimate Luxury: Rolls-Royce Cullinan Series 2 Review
Throttle House reviews the luxurious Rolls-Royce Cullinan Series 2, discussing its powerful V12 engine, opulent interior with unique Cloud perforation pattern, and extravagant Forge yellow details. Despite some compromises, it remains the ultimate SUV for those seeking unparalleled luxury on the road.
Lucid Air Sapphire Review: Power, Speed, and Handling Unleashed
Throttle House reviews the powerful Lucid Air Sapphire sedan, discussing its impressive 1430 lb-ft of torque, lightning-fast acceleration, and exceptional handling. Comparisons with other EVs are made, with the Lucid Air emerging as a top choice for driving enthusiasts.
McLaren 750s vs. Artura: Throttle House Review and Comparison
Throttle House reviews the McLaren 750s, comparing it to the Artura. They discuss design, performance, and preference for the Ferrari 296 and Porsche Turbo S over the 750s.