Tesla Model 3 Performance Track Test: Engineering Shortcomings Revealed
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
- Name
- By Dushyant
- (@dishs)
In this episode of Throttle House, Thomas and James put the Model 3 Performance through its paces on the track, expecting a leap in performance due to upgrades in power, aerodynamics, and chassis. However, the team quickly discovers issues with overheating brakes and tires, compromising the car's confidence mid-corner and under braking. Despite its fun drift mode and decent handling balance, the Model 3 Performance falls short in delivering the expected track performance, with lap times that do not match up to the competition.
As they push the car to its limits, the team highlights Tesla's approach of using temporary fixes like mud flaps to address underlying issues, emphasizing the need for better quality components for safety and longevity. While the Model 3 Performance offers good value for its performance, it fails to meet basic engineering standards when compared to other manufacturers. The team critiques Tesla's definition of "performance," pointing out the importance of not just adding power but ensuring overall engineering excellence for a truly competitive vehicle.
Despite the Model 3 Performance's enjoyable road performance and impressive handling balance, the team draws a line at considering it a true performance vehicle due to its shortcomings on the track. They stress the importance of engineering standards for safety and reliability, suggesting that Tesla needs to prioritize quality components over temporary solutions. While the car offers a thrilling driving experience, it ultimately falls short in delivering consistent track performance that can match up to its competitors.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch NEW Tesla Model 3 Performance Review // More Like POOformance, Amirite? on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for NEW Tesla Model 3 Performance Review // More Like POOformance, Amirite?
Older Tesla Model 3s were underbuilt for the track, lacking proper support for power and weight
Brake overheating warning on Model 3 Performance might be due to software estimating based on brake pedal pressure
Suggestions for improvements on the Model 3 include suspension and brakes
Mud flaps on Tesla models are generic accessories, with large flaps known to scrape
Mixed opinions on the Model 3 Performance redesign, with some noting issues with tires and brakes
Some viewers appreciate the fair review of the Model 3 without bias
Different car reviewers have varying takes on the same car, leading viewers to choose based on their preferences
Some viewers criticize the Model 3's performance on the track and its design
Comments on the lack of suitability of the Model 3 for track driving and the need for upgrades for better performance
Mention of Tesla's ability to update software to address issues, unlike other automakers
Related Articles
G580 vs. Escalade IQ: Luxury EV SUV Comparison
Throttle House compares the G580 with EQ tech to the new Escalade IQ, discussing their unique features and performance in the luxury EV SUV market.
Audi RS6 Performance Review: Ultimate Sleeper Wagon Showdown
Throttle House reviews the Audi RS6 performance, a powerful twin-turbo V8 wagon priced at $145,000. They discuss upgrades, interior quality, handling, and its competition with the M5 and E63. The RS6 is praised as the ultimate sleeper wagon, offering a blend of performance and luxury.
Aston Martin Vantage: New vs. Used, Driving Dynamics & Nostalgic Charm
Throttle House explores the Aston Martin Vantage in Southern California, comparing new vs. used models, driving dynamics, and nostalgic appeal.
Throttle House Reviews Escalade V: Power, Luxury, and Style
Throttle House reviews the Escalade V, boasting a facelift, powerful Supercharged V8 engine, and luxurious interior tech upgrades.