Tesla Model 3 Performance Track Test: Engineering Shortcomings Revealed
- Authors
- Published on
- Published on
- Name
- By Dushyant
- (@dishs)
In this episode of Throttle House, Thomas and James put the Model 3 Performance through its paces on the track, expecting a leap in performance due to upgrades in power, aerodynamics, and chassis. However, the team quickly discovers issues with overheating brakes and tires, compromising the car's confidence mid-corner and under braking. Despite its fun drift mode and decent handling balance, the Model 3 Performance falls short in delivering the expected track performance, with lap times that do not match up to the competition.
As they push the car to its limits, the team highlights Tesla's approach of using temporary fixes like mud flaps to address underlying issues, emphasizing the need for better quality components for safety and longevity. While the Model 3 Performance offers good value for its performance, it fails to meet basic engineering standards when compared to other manufacturers. The team critiques Tesla's definition of "performance," pointing out the importance of not just adding power but ensuring overall engineering excellence for a truly competitive vehicle.
Despite the Model 3 Performance's enjoyable road performance and impressive handling balance, the team draws a line at considering it a true performance vehicle due to its shortcomings on the track. They stress the importance of engineering standards for safety and reliability, suggesting that Tesla needs to prioritize quality components over temporary solutions. While the car offers a thrilling driving experience, it ultimately falls short in delivering consistent track performance that can match up to its competitors.
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Image copyright Youtube
Watch NEW Tesla Model 3 Performance Review // More Like POOformance, Amirite? on Youtube
Viewer Reactions for NEW Tesla Model 3 Performance Review // More Like POOformance, Amirite?
Older Tesla Model 3s were underbuilt for the track, lacking proper support for power and weight
Brake overheating warning on Model 3 Performance might be due to software estimating based on brake pedal pressure
Suggestions for improvements on the Model 3 include suspension and brakes
Mud flaps on Tesla models are generic accessories, with large flaps known to scrape
Mixed opinions on the Model 3 Performance redesign, with some noting issues with tires and brakes
Some viewers appreciate the fair review of the Model 3 without bias
Different car reviewers have varying takes on the same car, leading viewers to choose based on their preferences
Some viewers criticize the Model 3's performance on the track and its design
Comments on the lack of suitability of the Model 3 for track driving and the need for upgrades for better performance
Mention of Tesla's ability to update software to address issues, unlike other automakers
Related Articles
Exploring $50K Used Cars: Corvette, Shelby, Jag, Alpha 4C, BMW i8, Jaguar FType R
Throttle House explores $50,000 used cars like Corvette Stingray, Shelby GT 350, Jag FType R, Alpha 4C, BMW i8, and Jaguar FType R. Uncover their unique features and driving experiences.
BMW M5 Touring vs Audi RS6: Performance and Design Comparison
Throttle House reviews the BMW M5 Touring, comparing it to the Audi RS6. They discuss performance, handling, interior quality, and design, highlighting the M5's weight issues and the RS6's superior overall package.
German SUV Showdown: BMW vs. Mercedes vs. Audi
Throttle House compares BMW, Mercedes, and Audi SUVs. BMW dominates with power, Mercedes offers comfort, and Audi surprises in performance.
Ultimate Showdown: Ariel Atom 4R vs. Kum 620 on Welsh Roads
Throttle House explores the Ariel Atom 4R and Kum 620, showcasing their power and thrill on Welsh mountain roads. Experience the raw intensity of lightweight, high-performance sports cars in this epic showdown.